[ad_1]
A theory of life, is that the universe is the transformation of magic into a moral version of itself – a change from magic to moral magic.
Assuming this is the case, what happens, when reality becomes the transition of magic (not necessarily immoral magic?) to moral magic?
The transition of magic, to moral magic, is a moral magic that is a non-change of magic. A moral magic that is the non-change of magic is an immoral truth that is the non-change of magic – an immoral truth that is the non-change of magic is an immoral truth that is the change of truth.
An immoral truth, that is a change of truth is a change of reality that is a moral reality; a change of reality is a real symmetry, and a real symmetry that is a moral reality is an actual balance that is an immoral magic.
Thus far, the actuality of balance is a magic that’s unfair. Of course, there’s no reason to understand this logic, but then that’s why the process isn’t over yet: an actual balance is not the same as balance, which means that just balance has the right to be equated with a moral magic (which obviously feels far more logical) – a balance that is a moral magic is a moral magic that is an imbalance.
Another description, for moral magic, is a balanced imbalance. A balanced imbalance that is an imbalance is an imbalance that is a balanced balance – an unfairness that is a fair fairness (a fairness that possesses consciousness).
The injustice of a living fairness, is the justice of a non-living fairness – the justice of an inactive fairness.
And then after the justice of an inactive fairness, how much more is left? God knows the process has produced a fair amount of change, and it’s produced a fair amount of evolution, but even now, can there yet be much more left to figure?
The justice of an inactive fairness, or an inactive justice, is an inactive justice that’s unjust; an inactive justice that’s unjust is a dead justice that’s unjust – a living injustice that’s unjust.
A living injustice, that’s unjust, is a living evolution that’s itself; the reverse of a living evolution that’s itself is a living perfection that isn’t itself – finally, I’ve arrived at a point where I’m beginning to feel happy.
A living perfection is an evolving perfection, and an evolving perfection is a perfection that is subject to the rules of reality. In continuing the usual process, a perfection that is subject to the rules of reality that isn’t itself is a perfection that is subject to the rules of reality that simply doesn’t exist – bingo!
Rules of reality aren’t rules, and so, rules of reality must also be perfection. A perfection that is subject to a perfection that doesn’t exist is a perfection that is subject to a perfection that is perfection.
A perfection that is subject to a perfection that is perfect is the truth that a perfection can’t be subject to a perfection; the truth that a perfection can’t be subject to a perfection is the truth that a perfection must oppose a perfection.
Conversely, a weakness must not oppose a weakness – or in other words, every aspect of history must support every other aspect of history.
A part of history is a part of a sequence. A part of a sequence is a sequence of no part – a sequence that has no division.
A sequence is a division. A division that’s one must support another division that’s one; a division that’s one is a 2 that’s 1 – a 2 that’s 1 is a 1 that isn’t 2, and a 1 that isn’t 2 is just a 1 that’s 1.
1 being 1 is anti being anti. Anti being anti is not being anti. Not being anti is being self: being self must be the support of being self.
Being self is anti; anti must be the source of anti – a source can’t have an anti that exists more than once.
To sum up: once reality has its source, nothing past the source can exist more than once (which of course runs completely counter to the DNA of reality).
Nations are different, but any nation is a replication. Emotions are different, but any emotion is a replication. Personalities are different, but any personality is a replication.
Sports are different, but any sport is a replication. Houses are different, but any house is a replication. Careers are different, but any career is a replication.
Women are different, but any woman is a replication. Planets are different, but any planet is a replication.
Etc etc.
To balance the universe, and to serve God, the universe needs to arrange itself so that anything in the universe isn’t a replication.
[ad_2]
Source by Thomas H Cullen
Comments are closed.